JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 14, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Fanny Cecilia Romero Rojas

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad De Ley En Materia Tributaria
  • Rechazar recurso de súplica por falta de razones claras, específicas, pertinentes y suficientes
  • Recurso de súplica
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica interpuesto contra el auto del 15 de marzo de 2013, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto la corrección efectuada no cumplió los requisitos establecidos en la jurisprudencia para ser admitida, toda vez que el demandante no incluyó un contenido nuevo al analizado en el auto que resolvió la inadmisión.

La Sala Plena CONFIRMA el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto proferido por la Magistrada Maria Victoria Calle Correa, el quince (15) de marzo de dos mil trece (2013) por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda instaurada por la ciudadana Fanny Cecilia Romero Rojas.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.